Monday, 31 August 2026 The Independent Journalist · Fact-based reporting Edition: India
The Independent Journalist

Report

Household Savings Rise on Paper but Indian Families May Still Be Under Financial Pressure

·

The government says household savings in India increased from ₹52.25 lakh crore in FY23 to ₹69.01 lakh crore in FY25. It also says household savings as a share of GDP increased from 20% to 21.7%. This information was given in Parliament by Minister of State for Finance Pankaj Chaudhary, using the new GDP data series released by MoSPI with 2022-23 as the base year.

But this does not mean every family in India has more cash in hand. The word “household savings” in this data includes many things. It includes money saved in banks and financial investments, but it also includes physical assets like houses, land, real estate, gold and valuables. So, when the government says savings increased, it is not only talking about bank balance or cash savings.

This is why the number may not match what many common people feel in daily life. A family may be counted as saving because money is going into a house, gold, land or other assets. But at the same time, that same family may be struggling with EMIs, rent, school fees, hospital bills, food prices, fuel costs and other daily expenses.

The official consumption survey also shows why many people may not feel financially comfortable. MoSPI’s Household Consumption Expenditure Survey 2023-24 said the average monthly spending per person was only ₹4,122 in rural India and ₹6,996 in urban India, not counting the value of free items received through government schemes.

This means many families still live with limited spending power. So, even if the national savings number has gone up, the daily reality for many people may still be tight budgets, careful spending and financial stress.

Another important point is that this savings number is a national total. It combines rich families, upper-middle-class families, property owners, investors, business owners, middle-class families and poor families into one big figure. Because of this, the number may look good even if many ordinary families are not saving much.

For example, if wealthy families buy more property, invest more in mutual funds, or benefit from higher property and stock prices, the total household savings number can increase. But that does not prove that all middle-class and lower-income families are becoming financially stronger. A rise in the national total can sometimes hide the pressure faced by ordinary households.

There is also a technical issue. SEBI-linked research found that a change in the way securities-market savings are calculated increased the household savings-to-GDP ratio for FY25 from 21.23% to 21.7%. This means part of the rise also came from a better or revised method of counting investments, not only from people suddenly saving much more money.

The biggest reason to be careful with this headline is household debt. RBI’s Financial Stability Report data, as reported in 2026, showed that household debt reached 45.5% of GDP. This means Indian households are also borrowing more. The rise in debt was mainly because of non-housing retail loans.

Non-housing retail loans include loans such as personal loans, credit card borrowing, vehicle loans, consumer durable loans and other consumption-related loans. RBI-linked reporting said these non-housing retail loans formed 58.4% of total household borrowings as of March 2026. These loans have been growing faster than housing loans, agriculture loans and business loans.

This is important because a housing loan usually helps create an asset like a house. But many non-housing loans are taken for consumption or for things that lose value over time, such as vehicles or consumer goods. If more household income goes into paying loan EMIs, then families may feel financial pressure even if national savings data looks positive.

Earlier data also showed stress. In FY23, household net financial savings had fallen to around 5.1% of GDP, which was described as a 47-year low. At the same time, household financial liabilities had increased sharply.

So, the improvement seen in FY25 is partly a recovery from a weak situation earlier. It does not automatically prove that all households have become comfortable. Business Standard reported that net household financial savings increased to 7% of GNDI in FY25, mainly because financial liabilities came down from 6.4% of GNDI in FY24 to 4.8% in FY25. But gross household financial savings actually reduced slightly from 12.1% to 11.8% of GNDI.

In simple words, net savings improved partly because households borrowed less than before, not only because households saved much more. If liabilities reduce, net savings can look better, even when actual fresh savings are not rising strongly.

So, when the government says “household savings increased,” the statement is supported by official data. But if someone says this means ordinary families are relaxed, rich or free from financial pressure, that is not fully proven.

A large part of household savings is also locked in physical assets. Informist reported that household savings in physical assets were 13.9% of GDP in FY25, while gross financial savings were 12.0% of GDP and financial liabilities were 4.9% of GDP. This shows that much of the savings is in assets like property and other physical investments, not necessarily liquid cash available for emergencies.

The government also says higher savings are supported by income tax relief up to ₹12 lakh, GST rate rationalisation, RBI’s control on risky credit and broader measures such as employment, skilling, infrastructure and ease of doing business. These steps may help some households and businesses, but they do not prove that every family has more money left at the end of the month.

So, the simple conclusion is this: the savings number is not fake, but it must be understood carefully. India’s total household savings may have increased on paper, but many families may still be facing pressure from loans, prices, rent, education, healthcare and daily expenses. The official number shows the national picture, but the common man’s experience can still be very different.

Share: